A Glimpse into the New Plan-Making Framework
July 5, 2022
Robert Hayward
537 Views
The Levelling up & Regeneration Bill landed on 11 May. Behold! a new plan-making framework starts to appear as you read through it, with a defined strategic layer (more than two authorities) and local layer (one authority) and high-level descriptions for content.
On the strategic side, the Bill gives the option for two or more authorities to jointly prepare a Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) and sets out the content of these strategies at Section 15AA:
‘A joint spatial development strategy must include a statement of the policies (however expressed) of the participating authorities, in relation to the development and use of land in the joint strategy area, which are— (a) of strategic importance to that area, and (b) designed to achieve objectives that relate to the particular characteristics or circumstances of that area…’
Note that the content is in relation to the development and use of land for now.
It also says:
‘A joint spatial development strategy may specify or describe infrastructure the provision of which the participating authorities consider to be of strategic importance to the joint strategy.’
And what is strategic importance?
‘a matter—(a) may be of strategic importance to the joint strategy area if it does not affect the whole of that area, but (b) is not to be regarded as being of strategic importance to that area unless it is of strategic importance to the area of more than one of the participating authorities.’
So it has to be related to at least two local authority areas. But what can’t an SDS do?
‘A joint spatial development strategy must not—(a) include anything that is not permitted or required by or under the preceding provisions of this section, (b) specify particular sites where development should take place, or (c) be inconsistent with or (in substance) repeat any national development management policy.’
The accompanying explanatory notes provides an example of a policy to clarify (b), titled ‘Identifying capacity for development.’
‘A joint SDS could identify a broad area for an approximate scale of development, such as, to the north-west of town x and the south of river y there is scope for new development of at least xx new homes.’
So a traditional broad location for development, similar to what was included in a Core Strategy in the LDF era.
To understand more about this new(ish) strategic layer, the local layer needs to be understood, and its relationship with the strategic layer.
Section 15C lays down the requirement for all authorities to prepare a local plan, and only one in effect at any time. Section 15I allows authorities to prepare a joint local plan. On their content, 15C says:
‘The local plan must set out policies of the local planning authority (however expressed) in relation to the amount, type and location of, and timetable for, development in the local planning authority’s area.’
So we have three types of plan, two voluntary (SDS and joint local plan) and one requirement (local plan), with the following prescriptive requirements:
The local plan requirements are similar to their existing requirements – for example, authorities have to establish the housing target, find sites and allocate sites to meet the target, and include a trajectory to demonstrate the target is deliverable. In contrast, there is no reference to amount of development in the SDS and therefore it can be inferred that the SDS is more about testing capacity and developability of broad locations (not sites), and the strategic infrastructure needed to support these, to give direction to the local plan and its focus on delivearbility.
However, the role of the joint local plan is confusing given the introduction of SDSs. If joint local plans are prepared then they would, by their nature, include strategic (cross-boundary) issues, which is what SDSs are for. Also, the term joint local plan is in itself a contradiction as if you have a plan with two local authorities together then it’s not ‘local’ anymore. So it’s questionnable to include these in a new plan-making framework.
That said, the Bill does show a big step forward from the current plan-making framework in the NPPF which only allows for joint local plans. There is now a statutory strategic plan option that appears to be designed for strategic planning. But there’s little further detail in the Bill to really understand these types of plan and how they are supposed to work. Getting the detail right will be critical to facilitating and incentivising strategic planning. For example, the plan periods and evidence base for SDSs (particulary if they look much longer term than local plans), the relationship between local plans and SDSs, and how existing local plans will work with new SDSs, and so on. We will have to wait for the proposed changes to the NPPF and new regulations to see how this all works out. More to follow anon.
To download this article click here.
Robert Hayward is a Associate Planner at David Lock Associates. The views expressed are personal.

Robert Hayward
Associate
RELATED NEWS
Refurbishment of Mortimer Square, The Hub Milton Keynes
September 13, 2023
The square was in need of refurbishment to create a more usable and attractive public space, that also benefitted the business that operate out of the area.
Recruiting Planners
August 15, 2023
We are currently recruiting MRTPI chartered planners/senior planners to join our dynamic planning and masterplanning practice.
Mexborough Futures Masterplan
August 2, 2023
The City of Doncaster Council have produced the Mexborough Futures Masterplan, a comprehensive masterplan to guide future investments and address key challenges in Mexborough Town Centre.
Policy Considerations for Site Allocations
July 31, 2023
One of the main purposes of local plans is to allocate sites to deliver strategic priorities. But what is in national policy and guidance to help authorities and practitioners with this process – from identifying sites to assessing sites to selecting sites for allocation.
End of Term Report
July 21, 2023
As we reach the end of the academic summer term, we’ve taken a look back at some of our activities in helping encourage and inspire the next generation of planners and urban designers.
DLA Working Towards Planet Mark Certification
July 18, 2023
We are proud to announce that we are working with Planet Mark to measure and reduce our carbon footprint, ensuring that we build further on sustainability in our business practices.
Resolution to Grant Bluehayes Community
July 13, 2023
The new Bluehayes community will consist of 870 additional homes and is a key part of the planned growth for Cranbrook which will take it to 8,000 new homes.
Detailed Planning Permission Secured for Baytree Leeds
June 28, 2023
David Lock Associates (DLA), on behalf of our client Baytree Logistics Development Ltd, has secured detailed planning permission for the redevelopment of the former Maritime container depot in Leeds.
David Lock Awarded with Ebenezer Howard Medal
June 20, 2023
At the TCPA Parliamentary Reception yesterday evening, our founder David Lock, was presented with the Ebenezer Howard Medal which recognises the outstanding contribution of recipients to delivering the Garden City Principles.
Active Design Guidance Update Launches
May 24, 2023
The updated Active Design Guidance was released recently, drafted by DLA on behalf of our clients Sport England.