Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission – Call for Evidence?
May 20, 2019
Simon Pugh
3242 Views
I read the recent announcements that the Commission for BBBB have decided to start their activities with a ‘call for evidence’ with a sinking heart. Am I alone in thinking this is absolutely the wrong place to start?
Following passage through The Houses of Parliament, The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) was dissolved by the Conservative Government on 21 January 2012 via statutory instrument, with Tourism and Heritage Minister at the time, John Penrose saying “CABE did a lot of good work and much of it will continue in different places. The organisation may be coming to an end under the order, but its work and the principles that it embodied will continue. I hope and expect that the public sector’s commitment to good design in our built environment will continue, too.”
The aim of CABE was to improve quality, or ‘beauty’ (in its latest iteration). Good design principles haven’t changed. So why on earth would the ‘Building Better, Building Beautiful’ Commission’ now propose to spend more hundreds of thousands of pounds, untold hours from professionals and consultancies, and take a couple of years to get to basically the same place?
Located (hidden away) in the National Archives is the CABE website[1]; transferred there on 18 January 2011, just 17 days after its last publication on 1st January 2011. It holds an immense library of pretty much everything CABE did in its 12 years of existence. This includes 309 publications, across 47 categories/subjects, including public space; planning; housing; neighbourhoods; the value of design; parks and green spaces; regeneration; streets; school design; and of course, design review. The design review process as advocated by CABE remains an excellent way of raising design standards: requiring rigorous design evolution and clear articulation by project professionals to be undertaken prior to engaging in a formal peer review process to ensure the best possible design for a new, expanded or regenerated place.
At DLA, our multiple experiences with design review panels were overall very positive, our main frustration being that some of the panel members selected for various projects – particularly the large scale ‘new places’ that DLA is well known for and has so much experience – simply didn’t have the required credible experience to be able to review such projects. In the main, the panels were chaired by excellent professionals such as Ben van Bruggen, who ensured that a proportionate, balanced and constructive view was given.
CABE’s 309 publications – prepared in a measured and comprehensible way – took 12 years to produce and did raise the bar for design quality. Can we afford the time and cost of going through this process again when design quality is given such little relative weight at present, but development at speed to deliver new homes and jobs is an absolute priority?
Have good design principles changed that much that we need to re-invent the wheel yet again? No, of course they haven’t. Please, please please, let’s use the knowledge and evidence gained, and numerous comprehensive publications already in the system to get design back on the main agenda as quickly as possible. Review, rebrand, refresh, of course; put in place a new ‘champion’; absolutely – someone to be the ‘face’ and drive behind it – but let’s not take another 12 years to build the same body of guidance and evidence.
Having looked through the matters and questions posed in the recent call for evidence, are there any elements that could not be answered exceptionally well by re-activating the information and documents safely stored (hidden away) in the National Archive?
Simon Pugh is a Partner at David Lock Associates Ltd. The views expressed are his own.
[1] https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118095905/http://www.cabe.org.uk/home
RELATED NEWS
Unnecessary Trouble
Support for the principle of major reform of the planning system is widespread, but the Planning White Paper's ideas are impractical and threaten to destroy trust, says David Lock.
A win for DLA at the Planning Awards 2020!
DLA has won the award for plan-making at the Planning Awards 2020 for our work on the Strategic Growth Study for Milton Keynes.
Sport England – Making a Planning Application Guide
DLA has been delighted to work with Sport England on their Making a Planning Application Guide, which has recently been published.
The Osborns at Welwyn Garden City
In an article for the TCPA celebrating 'Welwyn Garden City at 100', David Lock outlines the contribution of Frederic and Margaret Osborn to the development and life of Welwyn Garden City.
Plaster Pyramids and Market Places
Driven by and named after Article 25 of the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 25 is a humanitarian architectural charity which helps vulnerable communities around the world through design to improve health, livelihoods and resilience to disasters. Over the previous 9 years, their annual flagship fundraising event '10x10 London' has raised hundreds of thousands of pounds to help them carry out their incredible work on over 90 projects in 34 countries.
Redevelopment in Aylesbury Vale given go ahead
David Lock Associates (DLA) has obtained outline planning permission on behalf of Mr Peter Dean and Archaylen Property Limited for 18 dwellings and related development at Coldstream Farm, Worminghall on the edge of the former Aylesbury Vale district.
South Oxford Local Plan Virtual EiP – a first view of the new ‘normal’
This week we have been representing Hallam Land Management at the virtual South Oxfordshire Local Plan Examination in Public (EiP), the first event of its kind. The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) has already expressed that similar virtual events are here to stay for the foreseeable and has recently announced the virtual resumption of a number of other EiPs as well as launching a new guide on how to participate in virtual events.
Time to rebuild the public’s trust in our Planning System
Has confidence in planning as a public service ever been so low? Like most, I have been watching with interest as the 'Westferry Farce' unfolds across the tabloids, with seemingly a new turn every week. Whilst details are murky (and I am not going to embark on a sentencing of our Rt Hon Mr Jenrick in this piece), its impacts on our profession on a day to day basis could be catastrophic.
Phase Two plans submitted for the regeneration of Hayle Harbour
Plans for ‘Phase Two’ of the Hayle Harbour regeneration project have been submitted to Cornwall Council by David Lock Associates, on behalf of Sennybridge (Hayle) Ltd. This represents the final set of reserved matters proposals pursuant to the outline application which was granted in 2010, and will facilitate multi-million pound investment to bring new life to the historic harbour.
How DLA are helping to inspire the next generation of Town Planners and Urban Designers
This week we're embarking on our biggest technical challenge of lockdown so far. We've had DLA staff meetings with 60+ attendees (and thankfully the ability to mute each other) and regular 'virtual' meetings with our colleagues, clients and co-consultants since March but we are about to go to another level!
