Chipping away the Green Belt
July 3, 2019
Robert Hayward
2810 Views
Since 2011, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government have published annual statistics[1] of the Green Belt. As can be seen in our video, these statistics show that there is more loss than gain of Green Belt.
But most change to the Green Belt has been small-scale, between -2% and 2% percent. And the headline numbers do not tell the true story; for example, the largest loss of Green Belt in Coventry includes the re-designation of Green Belt to Local Green Space[2].
Given that there is greater loss of Green Belt than gain, and that the loss of Green Belt is such a sensitive issue (so sensitive that there is no planning guidance on how to make changes to Green Belt…) how can the losses be offset?
National policy is the starting point. The Green Belt has its own chapter in the National Planning Policy Framework[3]: ‘Protecting Green Belt land’. (This suggests it is always under threat of being damaged/lost rather than a valuable policy that helps to limit sprawl and coalescence.)
Relating to new Green Belt, it says: “The general extent of Green Belts across the country is already established … New Green Belts should only be established in exceptional circumstances, for example when planning for larger scale development such as new settlements or major urban extensions.”
You can surmise from these sentences that new Green Belt across England is not up for debate, and that the preferred circumstances for adding new Green Belt is when new settlements are being proposed, rather than existing settlements that are under threat of coalescing or sprawling.
The NPPF also requires criteria to be met for new Green Belt proposals. One of these is that it must be demonstrated why normal planning and development management policies would not be adequate.
Cheshire East Council recently tried to add new Green Belt, as they felt their existing Green Gaps policy was not strong enough to resist development pressures, but the Inspector concluded that the circumstances were not exceptional enough to allow for new Green Belt. And in Guildford, new Green Belt was proposed to prevent coalescence between two urban areas, but the Inspectors dismissed the proposal as “separation can be maintained through ordinary non-Green Belt policies”.
Therefore, it will be difficult to add new Green Belt when the default position is that “normal” policies should suffice. The campaigns by the Campaign to Protect Rural England to get new Green Belt established around Norwich[4] and Southampton[5] will need to think carefully about their exceptional circumstances cases, or just badge the proposals as a normal policy rather than Green Belt.
On reflection, it seems strange that the general extent of the Green Belt is already established and fixed, especially when there are Green Belts around Oxford and Cambridge but not around other similar sized cities. And with such exceptional circumstances needed for new Green Belt, and normal policies being able to do just as good a job, the Green Belt appears destined to be endlessly chipped away over the years as the population grows and development pressures increase.
[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/green-belt-statistics
[2] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/open-space-sports-and-recreation-facilities-public-rights-of-way-and-local-green-space#Local-Green-Space-designation
[3] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework
[4] http://www.cprenorfolk.org.uk/2018/03/press-release-our-green-belt-for-norwich-map/
[5] http://www.cprehampshire.org.uk/campaigns/green-belt-for-south-hampshire
RELATED NEWS
DLA COVID-19 Risk Assessment
As the long autumn shadows stretch across the courtyard at North Thirteenth Street, we are settling into a new term. We do so in a world where the pandemic casts an even longer shadow; one that most of us did not dare to contemplate back in March.
Unnecessary Trouble
Support for the principle of major reform of the planning system is widespread, but the Planning White Paper's ideas are impractical and threaten to destroy trust, says David Lock.
A win for DLA at the Planning Awards 2020!
DLA has won the award for plan-making at the Planning Awards 2020 for our work on the Strategic Growth Study for Milton Keynes.
Sport England – Making a Planning Application Guide
DLA has been delighted to work with Sport England on their Making a Planning Application Guide, which has recently been published.
The Osborns at Welwyn Garden City
In an article for the TCPA celebrating 'Welwyn Garden City at 100', David Lock outlines the contribution of Frederic and Margaret Osborn to the development and life of Welwyn Garden City.
Plaster Pyramids and Market Places
Driven by and named after Article 25 of the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 25 is a humanitarian architectural charity which helps vulnerable communities around the world through design to improve health, livelihoods and resilience to disasters. Over the previous 9 years, their annual flagship fundraising event '10x10 London' has raised hundreds of thousands of pounds to help them carry out their incredible work on over 90 projects in 34 countries.
Redevelopment in Aylesbury Vale given go ahead
David Lock Associates (DLA) has obtained outline planning permission on behalf of Mr Peter Dean and Archaylen Property Limited for 18 dwellings and related development at Coldstream Farm, Worminghall on the edge of the former Aylesbury Vale district.
South Oxford Local Plan Virtual EiP – a first view of the new ‘normal’
This week we have been representing Hallam Land Management at the virtual South Oxfordshire Local Plan Examination in Public (EiP), the first event of its kind. The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) has already expressed that similar virtual events are here to stay for the foreseeable and has recently announced the virtual resumption of a number of other EiPs as well as launching a new guide on how to participate in virtual events.
Time to rebuild the public’s trust in our Planning System
Has confidence in planning as a public service ever been so low? Like most, I have been watching with interest as the 'Westferry Farce' unfolds across the tabloids, with seemingly a new turn every week. Whilst details are murky (and I am not going to embark on a sentencing of our Rt Hon Mr Jenrick in this piece), its impacts on our profession on a day to day basis could be catastrophic.
Phase Two plans submitted for the regeneration of Hayle Harbour
Plans for ‘Phase Two’ of the Hayle Harbour regeneration project have been submitted to Cornwall Council by David Lock Associates, on behalf of Sennybridge (Hayle) Ltd. This represents the final set of reserved matters proposals pursuant to the outline application which was granted in 2010, and will facilitate multi-million pound investment to bring new life to the historic harbour.
