Chipping away the Green Belt
July 3, 2019
Robert Hayward
3451 Views
Since 2011, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government have published annual statistics[1] of the Green Belt. As can be seen in our video, these statistics show that there is more loss than gain of Green Belt.
But most change to the Green Belt has been small-scale, between -2% and 2% percent. And the headline numbers do not tell the true story; for example, the largest loss of Green Belt in Coventry includes the re-designation of Green Belt to Local Green Space[2].
Given that there is greater loss of Green Belt than gain, and that the loss of Green Belt is such a sensitive issue (so sensitive that there is no planning guidance on how to make changes to Green Belt…) how can the losses be offset?
National policy is the starting point. The Green Belt has its own chapter in the National Planning Policy Framework[3]: ‘Protecting Green Belt land’. (This suggests it is always under threat of being damaged/lost rather than a valuable policy that helps to limit sprawl and coalescence.)
Relating to new Green Belt, it says: “The general extent of Green Belts across the country is already established … New Green Belts should only be established in exceptional circumstances, for example when planning for larger scale development such as new settlements or major urban extensions.”
You can surmise from these sentences that new Green Belt across England is not up for debate, and that the preferred circumstances for adding new Green Belt is when new settlements are being proposed, rather than existing settlements that are under threat of coalescing or sprawling.
The NPPF also requires criteria to be met for new Green Belt proposals. One of these is that it must be demonstrated why normal planning and development management policies would not be adequate.
Cheshire East Council recently tried to add new Green Belt, as they felt their existing Green Gaps policy was not strong enough to resist development pressures, but the Inspector concluded that the circumstances were not exceptional enough to allow for new Green Belt. And in Guildford, new Green Belt was proposed to prevent coalescence between two urban areas, but the Inspectors dismissed the proposal as “separation can be maintained through ordinary non-Green Belt policies”.
Therefore, it will be difficult to add new Green Belt when the default position is that “normal” policies should suffice. The campaigns by the Campaign to Protect Rural England to get new Green Belt established around Norwich[4] and Southampton[5] will need to think carefully about their exceptional circumstances cases, or just badge the proposals as a normal policy rather than Green Belt.
On reflection, it seems strange that the general extent of the Green Belt is already established and fixed, especially when there are Green Belts around Oxford and Cambridge but not around other similar sized cities. And with such exceptional circumstances needed for new Green Belt, and normal policies being able to do just as good a job, the Green Belt appears destined to be endlessly chipped away over the years as the population grows and development pressures increase.
[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/green-belt-statistics
[2] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/open-space-sports-and-recreation-facilities-public-rights-of-way-and-local-green-space#Local-Green-Space-designation
[3] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework
[4] http://www.cprenorfolk.org.uk/2018/03/press-release-our-green-belt-for-norwich-map/
[5] http://www.cprehampshire.org.uk/campaigns/green-belt-for-south-hampshire

Robert Hayward
Associate
RELATED NEWS
‘Effective Delivery of Strategic Sites’ Toolkit Shortlisted for RTPI Research Awards 2022
August 2, 2022
David Lock Associates, with PAS and the LGA, are delighted to have been shortlisted for the RTPI Awards for Research Excellence 2022 in the Planning Practitioner category for ‘Effective Delivery of Strategic Sites: A Toolkit for Planning Authorities’.
Baytree Milton Keynes in Full Swing
July 13, 2022
The Baytree Logistics Development Ltd ‘Baytree Milton Keynes’ industrial and distribution units recently became fully operational and pre-let.
Active Design Guidance Consultation
July 11, 2022
As part of DLA’s longstanding work with Sport England, we have recently been commissioned to update their Active Design Guidance, which we previously drafted on their behalf back in 2015 and 2007.
Remembering the Career of Ken Baker
July 7, 2022
Today is the Memorial and Celebration of Life of our dear friend and former colleague, Ken Baker, hosted by the Fred Roche Foundation.
A Glimpse into the New Plan-Making Framework
July 5, 2022
The Levelling up & Regeneration Bill landed on 11 May. Behold! a new plan-making framework starts to appear as you read through it, with a defined strategic layer (more than two authorities) and local layer (one authority) and high-level descriptions for content.
Houlton School Wins ‘Best Project’ Award
July 4, 2022
Houlton School has won the award for 'Best Project' at the West Midlands RTPI Awards 2022.
Helping to Create the Next Generation of Placemakers
July 4, 2022
We recently took a team of our planners and designers to a local secondary school, with Hallam Land, and ran workshops with year 9 students looking at how to design and develop a new part of MK.
Permission Secured for Box Road
June 20, 2022
David Lock Associates, on behalf of our client Hallam Land, have received outline planning permission for up to 42 dwellings and associated infrastructure for land at Box Road Cam, from Stroud District Council.
Urban Design Graduate Opportunities
June 17, 2022
David Lock Associates are recruiting graduate Urban Designers, to join our dynamic and growing team and work on our diverse portfolio of projects.
DLA Appointed to Update Sport England’s Active Design Guidance
June 16, 2022
David Lock Associates are delighted to have been appointed to update and review Sport England’s Active Design Guidance, which was initially published in 2015.