Government responds to the NIC Recommendations for the O2C Arc
November 12, 2018
Heather Pugh
2889 Views
Somewhat under the radar, the government published its response to the NIC’s Partnering for Prosperity in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford Arc report alongside the Autumn Budget papers.
The government’s response document tempers the enthusiasm of the NIC; seemingly neither its language nor its commitments to action reflect the ‘transformational’ ambitions set out in its November 2017 document. However, there are several points of interest worth noting, not least of which is that government has at last formally recognised a defined geographical area as constituting the Oxford- Cambridge Arc[1].
Statements which do signal the potential for significant changes to be made to current infrastructure projects include a commitment to consider the futureproofing of new infrastructure to allow for future growth in the corridor (EWR/Expressway specification), and the commissioning of a Cambridge corridor study to look at potential rail infrastructure which may be required 2033-2043 in Cambridgeshire, due to be completed by December 2018.
A number of other studies are announced formally in the response. Some of these have clearly been commissioned to flush out the evidence and test the NIC headline recommendation that the Arc should seek to provide 1M new homes and 1.1 Million new jobs; a headline which has been strongly criticised by some stakeholders as being adopted as a growth target without due consultation and strategic environmental assessment. The government expects the commissioning of analysis to test and evidence the strategic case for housing growth and explore the potential for new and expanded settlements within the Arc to provide further rationale and justification for the NIC figures, and to inform an “ambitious corridor-wide Joint Vision statement for the Arc to 2050” to be published by Spring 2019.
There are also indications that government is looking at more rigorous powers for local authorities to capture more uplift in land value arising from development: firstly, through endorsing the NIC (and other) recommendations to remove section 106 pooling restrictions and making a commitment to laying down Parliament Regulations to enable this, and secondly, exploring the appetite for locally-led Development Corporations by consulting on draft guidance for use of CPO powers and a legal framework for new town development corporations overseen by local authorities rather than the Secretary of State for HCLG. The testing of the waters for Development Corporations is furthered through the announcement of a “£10M competitive fund” to support local areas to generate their own proposals for new business-backed Development Corporations or similar.
Interestingly, the response states that “a Ministerial Champion for the Arc is to be appointed to provide further focus and facilitate coordination across Whitehall”. One might be forgiven for thinking this role is already in place; Iain Stewart, MP for Milton Keynes South was appointed by Sajid Javid as the champion for the Corridor in December 2017. However, as his activities have been remarkably low key in this regard over the last 12 months this announcement may signal a change in personnel, or indeed, a higher profile for the role going forward.
The Government have not accepted all the NIC recommendations. The future creation of a “pan-Arc” independent design panel for strategic infrastructure such as EWR and the Expressway, or for new/expanded settlements, has not been accepted; instead, government favours working with those existing design bodies already in place. This decision aligns with the emphasis on driving forward ‘locally-led’ plans for growth within the Arc, but does suggest that the importance of bringing together much more integrated design solutions to link road/rail infrastructure with development at the strategic level is not fully understood.
With regard to joint spatial plans, Government remains ambivalent about directing authorities to join forces in strategic plan making at this point in time and instead only “urges authorities in the Arc to work together” and “where appropriate”, develop joint statutory plans to underpin the long-term vision for the Arc. However, the ‘stick’ is still hovering in the background for those authorities who refused to play ball with their neighbours; “where government sees a clear need for doing so, the SoS for HCLG will utilise the powers under S28 A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 to direct local planning authorities in the Arc to undertake Joint Plans”.
It is evident from the response that there has been much discussion going on behind the scenes in Whitehall, and if nothing else, increased cross-Departmental engagement does appear to be surfacing in some of the associated activities and announcements coming from MHCLG in recent weeks. However, big questions remain over how the circle is going to be squared between the need to secure levels of growth in the Arc not seen since the boom times of previous Development Corporation days whilst at the same time ensuring this growth is “locally-led” and therefore accepted by local communities.
Notwithstanding ongoing consideration of potential local government reform, the government response defines this area as Oxfordshire County Council and the constituent districts, Buckinghamshire County Council and the constituent districts, Northamptonshire County Council and the constituent districts, Bedford Borough Council, Central Bedfordshire Council, Luton Borough Council, Milton Keynes Council, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority and the constituent councils.

Heather Pugh
Partner
RELATED NEWS
Are you looking for a new challenge as we emerge from lockdown?
April 12, 2021
David Lock Associates is recruiting Senior Associate/Associate/Senior level planners
DLA launches the Digital Studio
April 9, 2021
We are delighted to be launching the DLA Digital Studio!
Latest score: Cambridge and MK 1, Oxford and Bucks 0
March 18, 2021
The Ox Cam Expressway has been ‘cancelled’ so where does that leave strategic infrastructure?
Permission secured for new homes at Macclesfield
March 17, 2021
DLA has secured outline planning permission for 310 new homes to the south of Macclesfield, on behalf of Vistry Group.
International Women’s Day 2021
March 9, 2021
This International Women’s Day presented us with a unique situation, given the current climate we aren’t able to physically be with each other, as such we couldn’t be around the women who have impacted our lives and helped shape who we are. This International Women’s Day we decided to have a virtual afternoon tea and catch-up giving us the opportunity to share experiences, advise and formative moments.
Cranbrook Town Centre Milestone
March 5, 2021
Cranbrook has reached another hugely significant milestone this January with approval of East Devon District Council’s Cabinet to the design and implementation of its town centre – a much sought after aspiration of the towns 5,000 plus residents.
Digital Dagenham
February 24, 2021
During the global pandemic the importance of data centres has been realised, they are key pieces of national infrastructure. Keeping our laptops, zoom calls and mobile phones working during the day, before we watch streaming services in the evening.
Circle Health Rehabilitation Hospital shortlisted for 2021 RTPI Planning Award
February 19, 2021
David Lock Associates and our architect colleagues at Bryden Wood have been named as finalists in the category for Planning for Health and Wellbeing at the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Awards for Planning Excellence 2021.
Logistics Permission Secured by DLA
February 15, 2021
DLA have successfully secured detailed planning permission, on behalf of our client Baytree Logistics Properties.
Promotions at David Lock Associates
February 9, 2021
David Lock Associates is delighted to announce the promotions of Victoria Owen and Matthew Hewitt to Planner positions with the compan