Rejection of North Essex Garden Communities – A bitter blow for making places
May 22, 2020
Francesca Parmenter
1953 Views
The Local Plan Inspector’s rejection of two out of the three North Essex Garden Communities[1] again shines a light on a process that is frustratingly not fit for purpose when applied to new settlements. Even if that place is ripe for growth, makes geographic and economic sense and is promoted by local authorities that are creating a governance framework through which to deliver it.
The failure of the exam question that requires LPA’s to demonstrate how the considerable list of infrastructure items – to support the creation of a new community of some 50,000 people – can be delivered whilst keeping a scheme viable, is crushing the confidence and creativity of place-making enthusiasts.
What sort of places could be created if there was a collective confidence around a bold visionary framework without fear of being asked to show our working for every element stretching into the 3rd, 4th or even 5th decade of delivery? The Government, through the ‘Locally-led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities’ prospectus (March 2016) suggests we could be creating new towns and cities when we push beyond the 10,000 – 15,000 home threshold, but notwithstanding some new large-scale developments that are advancing towards these figures, we have not seen anything of a scale to rival the creation of the original Garden Cities or New Towns.
Never have we as a family appreciated more, the joy of cycling from our front door and into the rich network of cycle paths and leisure routes around Milton Keynes. Each daily trip brings a choice of route, landmark, and destination. Only made possible through ambitious visioning at scale and a robust framework underpinned by sharing development risks and rewards.
It is society that is really missing out and our progress that is inhibited if we can’t find ways to make good places beyond boundaries and housing market areas. If we don’t get to grips with building confidence to plan, invest and deliver at scale, we are restricting our potential to innovate, cultivate and celebrate new places.
We are missing out on opportunities to stimulate inclusive economic development; to apply creative and enduring solutions that deal with infrastructure constraints that currently limit growth ambitions; to plan for prosperity where benefits are shared between people and places; to deliver transformational mobility infrastructure; to achieve comprehensive green energy solutions; to invest comprehensively in health, education and social infrastructure; to have choice.
Covid-19 has brought into sharp focus that change can be both planned for, but also forced upon us. The future is uncertain, and we have to mobilise not least to respond to the climate change agenda and wealth and resource inequalities, but also to adapt to societal change and technological and service innovations.
The system we are trying to work within is clearly not delivering the opportunities that it should. The effectiveness of the process can be measured by its outcomes – held accountable to the limitations and compromises of the places it creates. If we are frustrated by the lack of growth and investment certainty, and disheartened by compromises made that are not in the public interest, then it is surely time to change the process so we can give ourselves the best chance. If we don’t, we will be failing so much more than our housing need.
[1] https://www.braintree.gov.uk/downloads/file/9294/ied022_-_inspectors_post-hearing_letter_to_neas_-_15th_may_2020
RELATED NEWS
Great Leighs, Chelmsford City Council, Essex – Strategic Growth Site
March 15, 2023
Masterplan Framework document to deliver around 950 new homes, 250 specialist elderly dwellings, together with a neighbourhood centre, site for a primary school and a Travelling Show-persons site, all set within a mature landscape setting adjacent to and integrated with the existing village.
Proposed Reforms to the NPPF, Summary Response
March 7, 2023
In December 2022, the UK Government released a consultation document proposing changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). You can read our summary response to this consultation here.
Project Skyway
February 21, 2023
David Lock on why we need to talk about a proposed long-distance network of drone based delivery ‘superhighways.’
Promotion at David Lock Associates
February 9, 2023
DLA is pleased to announce the promotion of Emily Benstead to the role of Planner. This recognition is a result of Emily achieving Chartered Member status with the RTPI and her noteworthy work as an Assistant Planner.
Houlton School wins RTPI Award for Planning Excellence
December 5, 2022
Houlton School wins the RTPI Award for Planning Excellence for ‘Excellence in Planning for Heritage and Culture’
DLA Working With STFC
October 27, 2022
David Lock Associates is delighted to be working with the Science and Technology Facilities Council (part of UK Research and Innovation) on a series of exciting development plans, which are helping to facilitate world-leading research.
Build Your Career at DLA
October 24, 2022
We are looking for enthusiastic, bright and committed graduate planners to join our leading spatial planning practice next summer.
New Recruits and Promotions at DLA
October 18, 2022
David Lock Associates is delighted to announce several new appointments following a recent recruitment drive, and promotions from earlier this year.
Speedy Approval for Prospero Ansty Business Park
October 3, 2022
David Lock Associates recently secured full planning permission for three flexible B2/B8 units at Prospero Ansty Business Park in Rugby Borough, which would deliver a combined floorspace of over 50,000 sq.m.